Photonic Impacts on Photosynthesis Phenomena Based On Crops Leaves



Abstract Views
150

Downloads
155

Citations

Share

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##

Submitted Jul 11, 2022
Published Aug 20, 2022
10.24018/ejphysics.2022.4.4.199

Abstract viewed = 150 times

Table of Contents

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

The objective of this work is to study the photonic force and impulses on a leaf, intensity after passing through the leaf, and molecular cross-section chlorophyll of the leaf. To study we use analytical and computational methods. The observation shows that photonic force and impulse on leaves of crops decrease with wavelength, intensity also decreases with the thickness of leaves and molecular cross-section of Chlorophyll a type is lesser than Chlorophyll b type. A study of this parameter shows the huge impact on the photosynthesis phenomena of plants which further disturbed the growth of plants in different parts of their body. With the study, it is also found that the spectrum of the visible range is suitable for the photosynthesis process because the energy gap of Chlorophyll a type and Chlorophyll b type lie in the visible spectrum region. In addition, the higher energy spectrum damages the photosynthesis process by damaging Chlorophyll a and Chlorophyll b. Hence, this study shows how the force, impulse, intensity, and molecular cross section affect the photosynthesis process and diet of plants which is related to leaves.

Keywords: Chlorophyll a Type, Chlorophyll b Type, Impulse, Intensity, Molecular Cross Section, Photonic Force, Photosynthesis Phenomena.

References

  1. Gulla J, Skaar J. Approaching Single-Photon Pulses. ArXiv. [Priprint] 2008. Available: arXiv:2008.07483v[quant-ph] [Accessed Jul 01 2022].
     Google Scholar
  2. Fondriest Environmental, Inc., Solar Radiation and Photosynethically Active Radiation, https://www.fondriest.com/environmental-measurements/parameters/weather/solar-radiation/ [Accessed on 25th June 2022].
     Google Scholar
  3. Schirillo JA. We infer light in space. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. 2013;20:905–915.
     Google Scholar
  4. Both AJ, Benjamin L, Franklin J. Guidelines for measuring and reporting environmental parameters for experiments in greenhouses. Plant Methods. 2015;11(43):5-10.
     Google Scholar
  5. Rahman MA, Moser A, Rotzer T, Pauleit S. Within canopy temperature differences and cooling ability of Tiliacordata trees grown in urban conditions. Building and Environment. 2017;114:118–128.
     Google Scholar
  6. Taiz L, Zeiger E. Plant Physiology. 3rd ed. Sinauer Associates, Inc.: Sunderland, MA, USA; 2002.
     Google Scholar
  7. Chen XL, Yang QC, Song WP, Wang LC, Guo WZ, Xue XZ. Growth and nutritional properties of lettuce affected by different alternating intervals of red and blue LED irradiation. Scientia Horticulturae. 2017;223:44–52.
     Google Scholar
  8. Olle M, Viršile A. The effects of light-emitting diode lighting on greenhouse plant growth and quality. Agricultural and Food Science. 2013;22:223–234.
     Google Scholar
  9. Chakraborty PK, Banerjee S, Mukherjee A, Nath R, Samanta S. Extinction coefficient and photosynthetically active radiation use efficiency of summer rice as influenced by transplanting. Journal of Environmental Biology. 2018;39:467-471.
     Google Scholar
  10. Bayat L, Arab M, Aliniaeifard S, Seif M, Lastochkina O, Li T. Effects of growth under different light spectra on the subsequent high light tolerance in rose plants. AoB PLANTS. 2018;10(53):2-6.
     Google Scholar
  11. Hogewoning SW, Wientjes E, Douwstra P, Trouwborst G, van Ieperen W, Croce R, Harbinson, J. Photosynthetic Quantum Yield Dynamics: From Photosystems to Leaves. The Plant Cell, 2012;24(5):1921–1935. https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.112.097972.
     Google Scholar
  12. Chichkov NB, Chichkov BN. On the origin of photon mass, momentum, and energy in a dielectric medium [Invited]. Optical Materials Express, 2021;11(8):2722. https://doi.org/10.1364/ome.436306.
     Google Scholar
  13. Oriel Product Training. Solar simulation. [Internet]. 16 June 2022. https://assets.newport.com/webDocuments-EN/images/12298.pdf.
     Google Scholar
  14. Adachi S. Earth-Abundant Materials for Solar Cells: Cu2-II-IV-VI4 Semiconductors. John Wiley & Sons; (2015).
     Google Scholar
  15. Reissig S. The Photon Power and Stefan-Boltzmann Radiation Law. Bulletin of the APS, March Meeting 2004, Part I, Montreal. 2004;49(1):255-226.
     Google Scholar
  16. Reissig S. Determination of the Photon Force and Pressure. The 35th Meeting of the DAMOP, Tucson. May 25-29, (2004).
     Google Scholar
  17. Manjunath R. Calculating the force exerted by the photon on the elementary particle. Nature and Science. (2010);8(10):82-88.
     Google Scholar
  18. Ritchie RJ. Modelling photosynthetic photon flux density and maximum potential gross photosynthesis. Photosynthetica. 2010;48(4):596-609.
     Google Scholar
  19. Pradhan S, Sehgal VK, Bandyopadhyay KK, Panigrahi P, Parihar CM, Jat SL. Radiation interception, extinction coefficient and use efficiency of wheat crop at various irrigation and nitrogen levels in a semiarid location. Indian Journal of Plant Physiology. 2018;23(3):416–425.
     Google Scholar
  20. Guang LC, Qiao ZX, Gang CD, Jun LL, Chang LJ, Ding CY. Natural Variation of Leaf Thickness and Its Association to Yield Traits in Indica Rice. Journal of Integrative Agriculture. 2014;13(2):316-325.
     Google Scholar
  21. Burgess AJ, Retkute R, Herman T, Murchie EH. Exploring Relationships between Canopy Architecture, Light Distribution, and Photosynthesis in Contrasting Rice Genotypes Using 3D Canopy Reconstruction. Frontiers in Plant Science. 2017;8(734):1-13.
     Google Scholar
  22. Gitelson A, Arkebauer T, Vina A, Skakun S, Inoue Y. Evaluating plant photosynthetic traits via absorption coefficient in the photosynthetically active radiation region. Remote Sensing of Environment. 2021;258(112401):1-8.
     Google Scholar
  23. Hedayatifar L, Irani E, Mazarei M, Rasti S, Azar YT, Rezakhani AT, Rahimi Tabar MR, et al. Optical absorption and electronic spectra of chlorophylls a and b. RSC Advances, 2016;6(111):109778–109785. https://doi.org/10.1039/c6ra20226h.
     Google Scholar
  24. Akça B, Erzeneoğlu SZ. The Mass Attenuation Coefficients, Electronic, Atomic, and Molecular Cross Sections, Effective Atomic Numbers, and Electron Densities for Compounds of Some Biomedically Important Elements at 59.5 keV. Science and Technology of Nuclear Installations, 2014;2014:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/901465.
     Google Scholar